We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Progressive Green Party[?]
This page contains information about the 
Progressive Green Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Workers' and Peasants' Ahmadi Emirate of Talmoria (Talmoria)
Seats[?] in Protectorate Assembly[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | moderate unitarist | high | perfect |
| Civil Rights | moderate permissive | limited | perfect |
| Ecology | moderate environmentalist | excellent | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | convinced internationalist | high | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | moderate | perfect |
| Market | moderate regulator | high | perfect |
| Military | moderate pacifist | high | perfect |
| Morality | moderate progressive | limited | perfect |
| Religion | moderate secular | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| October 4155 | 40,090 | 49,252,600 | 0.08 | +0.08 | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | +0 |
| February 4157 | 6,165,079 | 63,046,690 | 9.78 | +9.70 | 49 | 500 | 9.80 | +49 |
| June 4157 | 5,857,379 | 61,462,325 | 9.53 | -0.25 | 50 | 500 | 10.00 | +1 |
| June 4158 | 3,007,393 | 60,041,663 | 5.01 | -4.52 | 24 | 500 | 4.80 | -26 |
| January 4160 | 6,470,636 | 57,196,673 | 11.31 | +6.30 | 56 | 500 | 11.20 | +32 |
| December 4162 | 5,119,652 | 65,980,916 | 7.76 | -3.55 | 38 | 500 | 7.60 | -18 |
| December 4164 | 7,723,099 | 67,081,191 | 11.51 | +3.75 | 57 | 500 | 11.40 | +19 |
| December 4168 | 12,871,319 | 65,521,992 | 19.64 | +8.13 | 98 | 500 | 19.60 | +41 |
| May 4171 | 5,924,769 | 60,521,749 | 9.79 | -9.85 | 49 | 500 | 9.80 | -49 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Progressive Green Party.
| Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 |
| Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
| Cabinet Proposal of November 2639 | November 2639 | November 2639 | passed | ||
| National Investment program | January 2638 | April 2638 | passed | ||
| Compulsory Military/National Service Reform | September 2635 | September 2635 | defeated | ||
| Compulsory Military/National Service Reform | September 2635 | September 2635 | defeated | ||
| NIP Reforms | May 2635 | May 2635 | passed | ||
| Equality and religion destruction bill | April 2635 | April 2635 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 2635 | April 2635 | April 2635 | passed | ||
| Pestiside Bill | December 2634 | April 2635 | passed | ||
| Call for early elections, July 2633 | July 2633 | July 2633 | defeated | ||
| Equal Treatment | May 2633 | May 2633 | defeated | ||
| Anti Homo Reform | July 2632 | July 2632 | passed | ||
| War on Drugs | July 2632 | July 2632 | passed | ||
| Sweeping Reforms | July 2632 | July 2632 | defeated | ||
| Call for early elections, October 2631 | October 2631 | October 2631 | passed | ||
| Health act | November 2630 | November 2630 | passed | ||
| Call for early elections, December 2629 | December 2629 | December 2629 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of May 2627 | May 2627 | May 2627 | defeated | ||
| economic reform 8 | December 2626 | December 2627 | defeated | ||
| Cross Dressing Act | July 2626 | July 2626 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 2626 | April 2626 | April 2626 | defeated |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |