We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
United for Peace[?]
This page contains information about the United for Peace.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Joaquim_28
Nation[?]: Republic of Malivia / Malivia Prajatantra Gantantra (Malivia)
Seats[?] in Maliviyan Legislative Assembly or Malvian People's Free Congress or Pratinidhi Sabha[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | limited | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate small government | limited | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | close to none | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Morality | convinced progressive | limited | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
- International Social Democrats
- World Peace Society
- Liberal Environmentalists
- International Science, Education and Culture Organization
- Pro-life parties
- Conservatives International
- Artanian Union
- Forum for Reformist Co-operation
- International Terran Bank
- The New International Progressive Alliance
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
October 4390 | 78,194 | 60,805,314 | 0.13 | +0.13 | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | +0 |
October 4394 | 18,611 | 62,402,272 | 0.03 | -0.10 | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | +0 |
October 4398 | 23,594 | 58,894,973 | 0.04 | +0.01 | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | +0 |
October 4402 | 10,798,265 | 57,431,488 | 18.80 | +18.76 | 99 | 500 | 19.80 | +99 |
November 4404 | 12,351,765 | 55,710,339 | 22.17 | +3.37 | 114 | 500 | 22.80 | +15 |
November 4408 | 9,323,542 | 55,035,030 | 16.94 | -5.23 | 87 | 500 | 17.40 | -27 |
November 4410 | 14,132,631 | 54,125,097 | 26.11 | +9.17 | 135 | 500 | 27.00 | +48 |
November 4414 | 7,528,156 | 59,676,474 | 12.61 | -13.50 | 64 | 500 | 12.80 | -71 |
November 4418 | 1,929,746 | 56,040,113 | 3.44 | -9.17 | 16 | 500 | 3.20 | -48 |
April 4420 | 4,864,680 | 50,912,965 | 9.55 | +6.11 | 49 | 500 | 9.80 | +33 |
April 4424 | 3,324,142 | 61,571,409 | 5.40 | -4.16 | 29 | 500 | 5.80 | -20 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the United for Peace.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Call for early elections, July 4695 | July 4695 | July 4695 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 4695 | June 4695 | June 4695 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of August 4676 | August 4676 | August 4676 | defeated | ||
Paternal Emancipation Act | June 4676 | June 4676 | defeated | ||
Victim Closure Bill | June 4676 | June 4676 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of January 4675 | January 4675 | January 4675 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of January 4674 | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Visibility bill 2 | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Visibility bill | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, January 4674 | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Budget proposal of January 4674 | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of January 4674 | January 4674 | January 4674 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, January 4668 | January 4668 | January 4668 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, December 4665 | December 4665 | December 4665 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, January 4664 | January 4664 | January 4664 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of September 4662 | September 4662 | September 4662 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of March 4661 | March 4661 | March 4661 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 4659 | June 4659 | June 4659 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of January 4658 | January 4658 | January 4658 | passed | ||
Civil Rights Movement Bill of 4657 | May 4657 | May 4657 | defeated |
Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |