We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Royalists[?]
This page contains information about the Royalists.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Prince Rupert
Nation[?]: Holy Luthorian Empire (Luthori)
Seats[?] in Imperial Diet (lower house), Imperial Senate (upper house)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Royalists have been variously described as national conservatives, social conservatives, economic nationalists, Hosian nationalists, Luthorian nationalists, right-wing populists, traditionalist conservatives, reactionaries and bigots, but above all else they seek the return of the rightful emperor Richard II. Led by the Viscount Whittemore. Bromtwigg |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate restrictive | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | extreme skeptic | excellent | perfect |
Foreign Relations | extreme isolationist | excellent | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | big government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | extreme militarist | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | high | perfect |
Religion | convinced religious | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
January 4712 | 14,679,438 | 64,137,629 | 22.89 | +22.89 | 81 | 350 | 23.14 | +81 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Royalists.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Telephone Services Reform Act | October 3869 | October 3869 | defeated | ||
Mayoral appointments | September 3869 | September 3869 | defeated | ||
Food and Beverage Consumption Reforms | September 3869 | September 3869 | passed | ||
HSP Blasphemy measures | September 3869 | September 3869 | defeated | ||
Telephone provider reforms | September 3869 | September 3869 | defeated | ||
Stock Exchange Regulation | September 3869 | September 3869 | defeated | ||
HSP Nationalization measures | September 3869 | September 3869 | defeated | ||
Train Services Reforms and Privatisation Bill (3869) | June 3869 | July 3869 | passed | ||
Strike Protection Bill (3869) | June 3869 | July 3869 | defeated | ||
Legislative Reform Bill II | April 3869 | October 3869 | passed | ||
People's Right to Strike Act | April 3869 | April 3869 | passed | ||
Employee Protection Act | April 3869 | April 3869 | passed | ||
Labour Reform and Freedom Act | April 3869 | April 3869 | defeated | ||
People's Banks Act | April 3869 | April 3869 | defeated | ||
State Defence Industry Privatisation | April 3869 | April 3869 | defeated | ||
Paramilitaries Bill | April 3869 | April 3869 | passed | ||
Chemical Weapons Bill | April 3869 | April 3869 | passed | ||
Liberty Reform | April 3869 | April 3869 | defeated | ||
Protecting Our Citizens Act | April 3869 | April 3869 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of March 3869 | March 3869 | March 3869 | defeated |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |