We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Socio-Captialist Party[?]
This page contains information about the Socio-Captialist Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Communauté de Kanjor (Kanjor)
Seats[?] in Chambre des Députés (Chamber of Deputies)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
This party strives to have a socially liberal society, while maintaining a moderate fiscal stance. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | permissive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate small government | high | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | high | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Morality | progressive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
April 2344 | 4,609,618 | 53,923,575 | 8.55 | +8.55 | 19 | 225 | 8.44 | +19 |
April 2347 | 14,170,788 | 54,119,983 | 26.18 | +17.64 | 58 | 225 | 25.78 | +39 |
April 2350 | 14,890,424 | 43,957,158 | 33.87 | +7.69 | 76 | 225 | 33.78 | +18 |
April 2353 | 15,158,758 | 43,131,159 | 35.15 | +1.27 | 81 | 225 | 36.00 | +5 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Socio-Captialist Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
mem | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
nun | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
heth | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
yodh | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
zayin | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
daleth | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
waw | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
gimel | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
aliph | January 2241 | February 2241 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 2240 | June 2240 | June 2240 | defeated | ||
Phi | May 2239 | May 2239 | passed | ||
zeta | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated | ||
Chi | May 2239 | May 2239 | passed | ||
iota | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated | ||
Omega | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated | ||
psi | May 2239 | May 2239 | passed | ||
pi | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated | ||
sigma | May 2239 | May 2239 | passed | ||
tau | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated | ||
rho | May 2239 | May 2239 | defeated |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |