Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:02:30
Server time: 12:57:29, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |


Chattes en Chaleur[?]

This page contains information about the Chattes en Chaleur.

This party is inactive.

Details

User[?]: ShopWise

Nation[?]: Dai Sekouokoku (Seko)

Seats[?] in 国会 - Kokkai (Imperial Diet) [?]: 0

Color[?]:

 

Description[?]:

Chattes en Chaleur is a progressive populist party.

We believe a vigorous and universally available system of public education is basic to a productive, democratic society.

We pledge to ensure the political rights of all citizens through fair elections and responsible government.

We believe that all people should have the opportunity to be self-sufficient, secure and healthy. Cost-effective and adequately funded programs can help ensure these basic needs.

We recognize the intertwined relationship between national security and international policy. We believe in a foreign policy that strives for international cooperation, supports human rights, and respects international justice.

We believe in leaving the world in better condition than we found it.

We advocate strong law enforcement policies combined with vigorous crime prevention programs that emphasize education, treatment and rehabilitation.

We believe government budgets must be based on sound fiscal policies and fair taxation aimed at achieving economic growth, conservation of resources and full employment.

And last but not least, we believe that every household should be able to fulfill the universal dream of having their own chatte en chaleur.

Ministries

This party is not part of the national cabinet.

Political Positions

IdeologyPositionVisibilityCoherency
Centralizationmoderate unitaristhighperfect
Civil Rightsmoderate permissivehighperfect
Ecologyskeptic-leaningmoderateperfect
Foreign Relationsconvinced isolationistlimitedperfect
Government Responsibilitiessmall government-leaningmoderateperfect
Marketconvinced regulatorhighperfect
Militarymoderate militaristmoderateperfect
Moralitymoderate progressivehighperfect
Religionmoderate secularhighperfect

Affiliations

This party is a member of the following organizations:

Election Results

History Table

MonthVotesTotal VotesVotes (%)Votes (%) (+)SeatsTotal SeatsSeats (%)Seats (+)
June 243771,54275,240,9140.10+0.1001250.00+0
December 24414,007,45169,325,4945.78+5.69335995.51+33
December 24445,542,34969,039,2198.03+2.25475997.85+14
January 24488,428,08872,895,46111.56+3.536959911.52+22
January 245110,370,57174,331,71813.95+2.398459914.02+15
October 245213,116,01878,983,22016.61+2.659959916.53+15
October 24557,570,07876,180,6989.94-6.67585999.68-41
December 24557,280,79475,670,5689.62-0.32565999.35-2
December 24586,564,91878,583,2258.35-1.27495998.18-7
December 24615,764,57981,872,7897.04-1.31415996.84-8
December 24645,931,92080,631,6657.36+0.32435997.18+2
December 24673,647,84281,895,2164.45-2.90255994.17-18
December 24704,126,55283,130,5454.96+0.51295994.84+4
December 24735,256,63481,735,0526.43+1.47365996.01+7
December 24765,548,09882,279,9646.74+0.31415996.84+5
December 247915,485,73881,902,93918.91+12.1611359918.86+72
December 248212,342,94682,862,79514.90-4.019159915.19-22
December 24859,886,89585,397,50511.58-3.328675011.47-5
May 24888,996,93583,092,96510.83-0.758175010.80-5
March 24917,022,44583,580,2678.40-2.43637508.40-18
March 24946,802,61182,624,2988.23-0.17637508.40+0
February 25029,227,37285,359,24110.81+2.588075010.67+17
April 25029,741,97384,569,40711.52+0.718675011.47+6
April 25052,821,62486,461,9563.26-8.26237503.07-63

Relative Graph

This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.

Election History

Absolute Graph

This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.

Election History

National Graph

This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.

Election History

Legislation

You can view the party's proposed bills here.

Legislative Agenda

This party has to vote on the following bills:

Voting Record

This is the voting[?] record of the Chattes en Chaleur.

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373

BillCreatedVoting startedVoteBill StatusResult
Abolition on mandatory minimumsJune 5229March 5231defeated
Ratification of the Istalia Accord of DiplomacyMarch 5229August 5229passed
Presidential reformJune 5228June 5228defeated
Cabinet Proposal of February 5228February 5228February 5228passed
The Banking systemDecember 5227January 5233passed
Sekowan ArmySeptember 5226September 5226defeated
Agriculture, Forestry and Recycling FacilitiesJune 5226November 5226passed
Abortion RightNovember 5225November 5225passed
Call for early elections, June 5225June 5225June 5225defeated
In Vitrō FertilisationDecember 5224December 5224passed
Media RegulationNovember 5224May 5225defeated
(RP) Administrative ReformMay 5224January 5234defeated
Sedoretu LegalisationSeptember 5223November 5223passed
Tariffs of Foreign ImportsDecember 5222September 5223passed
Nuclear Energy RegulationDecember 5222September 5223passed
Forest ManagementDecember 5222September 5223defeated
Religious clothing in public buildingsJuly 5221November 5221defeated
Ownership of Exotic AnimalsJuly 5221November 5221passed
RP: Gagaku Promotion ActJuly 5221August 5221passed
Media Reform ActJuly 5221August 5221defeated

Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51