We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: MARC #2: "Greater Unification and Appropriation of Regional Defense" Draft 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Medrisite-Associated Revisionist Council
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2904
Description[?]:
"Allows the government to have more influence on defence to help unify and thus strengthen our ability to defend ourselves, while still providing the grounds for the innovation and competition that technological advancement - the basis for defense - that we need to ensure our defenses" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no | Total Seats: 315 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |