We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Transport Subsiding Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Party of Talmoria
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3012
Description[?]:
| Orange Town, March 3012 This project is needed to boost the process of growth of the country, as well as the other Infraestructure and Transport-based projects. Américo de Mello Minister of Infraestructure and Transport of the Republic of Talmoria --------------- Orange Town, Março de 3012 Este projeto é necessário para acelerar o processo de crescimento de nosso país, assim como todos os projetos da pasta do Ministério de Infraestrutura e Transporte. Américo de Mello Ministro de Infraesturtura e Transporte da República de Talmoria |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Current: Public transport is fully subsidised by the government.
Proposed: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 500 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |