We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of May 3084
Details
Submitted by[?]: Urban Party of Rutania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3085
Description[?]:
The National Party propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Rutania and Juclandia. |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
> 500 RUT | 10% | 2,853,000,000 RUT |
> 1,000 RUT | 12% | 6,848,000,000 RUT |
> 2,000 RUT | 13% | 7,002,000,000 RUT |
> 3,000 RUT | 15% | 6,588,000,000 RUT |
> 4,000 RUT | 20% | 6,541,000,000 RUT |
> 5,000 RUT | 20% | 4,345,000,000 RUT |
> 6,000 RUT | 25% | 13,220,000,000 RUT |
> 12,000 RUT | 50% | 3,436,000,000 RUT |
> 15,000 RUT | 75% | 1,764,000,000 RUT |
> 17,000 RUT | 80% | 216,000,000 RUT |
> 17,500 RUT | 85% | 198,000,000 RUT | Total | 53,011,000,000 RUT |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 300 | |
no |
Total Seats: 375 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |