We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Interracial Relationships
Details
Submitted by[?]: Algemeyner Manarkistishen Arbeter Bund
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3447
Description[?]:
| It is really quite disgusting that we do not treat interracial couples and same-racial couples on equal terms. Our policy is also bizarrely inconsistent, as we recognise their unions (though with fewer rights) and yet we ban them from having sex! Really, what justification could there possibly be for this? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government recognition of interracial marriages (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Interracial marriages are recognised by the government, but with fewer rights than those of same-race couples.
Current: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Proposed: Mixed race marriages follow the same regulation as other marriages.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Interracial sex is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 120 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "The right to suffer is one of the joys of a free economy." - Howard Pyle (commenting on unemployment in Detroit) |