We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to privacy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Government of Tropica
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3728
Description[?]:
the DLLCP wish to give people a right to privacy, not absolute, as we believe court should have the right to force individual to give information when necessary hoverer, shall this right be abused, we shall stripped the court of it, information should not only be given when necessary, the government has no place in the private life of people Delegate Speaker on Justice, Ada Martinez |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: not recorded
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 522 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "Take our country back" - Conservative Republican campaign slogan for the 4690 Likatonian election |