Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 01:06:09
Server time: 02:53:50, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Infinite | Luna11 | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Landmines Bill, 3839

Details

Submitted by[?]: Guglib Jeongchi Yeonhab

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3840

Description[?]:

If Dankuk enters a war, we need to use all means to ensure our soldiers are kept safe. If that means using landmines, then so be it. Put our boys first.

Jeong Jin Ji
Party Chairman

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 325

no
    

Total Seats: 425

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Benefits should be conferred gradually; and in that way they will taste better." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 36