We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 2nd Civil liberties Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Party (NP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3909
Description[?]:
| The first Civil liberties reform that passed in 3902 was a success, but while the time was going we noticed two articles that need a revision: 1) The overpopulation is a contemporary issue, and many country in the world are starting to suffer of this grave problem. To begin a battle against this problem we propose to tax every couple that gives birth to a third son in up, so we aren't forcing them to not have the number of children they want but they know they will pay for that. 2) This is a great lack in our laws, of course we don't want to forbid to any private citizen to buy every weapon he wants (if he has the permits), but obviously there are places where they should not carry them for the well of public safety. - Pres. Werner Achterop, NP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: The government actively promotes population growth.
Current: The government actively promotes population growth.
Proposed: The government taxes children beyond a certain number per couple.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapons, but certain types are restricted to designated places.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 222 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 179 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family." - Saul Alinsky |