We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Bill of November 3989
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kushite Revolution
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3990
Description[?]:
For the safety of our citizens. In situations that require immediate completion of the enemy,for example in terrorist camps,chemical and biological weaponry should be uses where invasion has proven difficult. The government has to go through all means necessary to secure our sovereignity as a nation. Leaving the defence industry to the private sector may lead to leaking of information to the enemy on the amount,type and power of the weaponries that we hold. Therefore the goveenment needs to set up its own industry for privacy purposes as some coded info if disclosed to the public may be a security threat. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 75 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - Thomas Paine |