We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ending the Judicial Bureaucracy - 4015
Details
Submitted by[?]: Great National Republican Guard
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4015
Description[?]:
| The judicial bureaucracy is a prime feature of the bourgeois 'justice' system. It promotes a structure of rules with a dual character. This structure is 'protected from' the democratic elements of the state through liberal nonsense about separation of powers. The structure is flexible enough for the wealthy to work around it, but rigid enough to ensure that the wealthy retain their property rights above all else. In our great moves towards Socialism, where the light of a new era shines on Lodamun, the corrupt members bourgeoisie hide behind the shadows of the judicial bureaucracy. We must dismantle the judicial bureaucracy if we want to: - properly tackle corruption - ensure that laws are not too rigid for the poor - ensure that laws are not too flexible for the wealthy By transferring judicial responsibilities to the Office of the President, judicial matters can be handled much more transparently. If a President misuses his judicial powers, the Presidium can quickly sack him/her and replace him/her with a new President. With the judicial bureaucracy, even the most judges are protected by the bourgeois principle that the Judiciary should be 'independent' from the Presidium and the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to appeal against a judgement rendered by a court.
Old value:: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Current: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Proposed: Judgements may only be appealed against for grave procedural errors.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are no courts, the Head of State will determine what's right or wrong.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 186 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 229 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 184 |
| Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
| Random quote: "It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both." - Niccolo Machiavelli |