We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Advertising Bill 4309
Details
Submitted by[?]: Secularist, Socialist Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4310
Description[?]:
| Members of Congress, We should not allow terrorists or those with hateful ideologies radicalise through advertisements, by not allowing that but allowing religious advertising, the state is drawing a subjective line. While we must protect freedom of speech by allowing evangelism, it is not possible for us to also allow religious advertising without the State making subjective distinctions which leads to our laws being decided in the courts. Clementine Attlee Leader of the Opposition |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Current: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Proposed: Religious organizations are not permitted to actively promote themselves or advertise, however evangelism is permitted by individuals.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 147 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 399 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "Casting a vote shouldn't make you sick." - Ronnie Dugger |