We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Dueling Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4378
Description[?]:
| The Labour Party believes dueling to be an archaic and distasteful tradition, and one which must be ended at once. Presently, local authorities have the power to determine the legality of dueling: this is beyond ridiculous, and opens the door to many deaths under suspicious circumstances under the pretext of death having come about as a result of a duel. Moreover, we ought to bring ourselves in line with the vast majority of countries around the globe which ban dueling. If we are to claim ourselves to be a progressive and liberal nation, we must ban dueling at once. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of dueling.
Old value:: This matter is left for the local governments to decide upon.
Current: Dueling is illegal.
Proposed: Dueling is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 417 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 65 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 268 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I am loyal to the ideas, not to the institutions." - Cyro Aquila, former Selucian politician |