We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Inauguration speech by Gim Jang Mu, Minister for Religion
Details
Submitted by[?]: 천국연합 ☸️ Spiritual Center
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 5016
Description[?]:
May Danseon bless our nation! May Bidar grant our people his mercy! Ladies and gentlemen! After decades of state atheist policy finally the legitimate rights of all believers of our entire homeland are being restored! This was not alone because of the uncompromising effort of our party, but with the help of our socialist brothers in mind as well the help of the conservative party, which also backed up the new policy. Finally the voices of the religious parts of our people will not be silenced again! My party represents the interests of the Sindo-Daenists as everyone should know. Despite of that fact I was elected to talk with the broad sphere of believers in our country and take care about their lawful, legitimate interests. I pledge to do so. For that reason I am calling in a religious roundtable with represents of the Sindo-Daenists, the Hosianists, Draddwyrs, Seodongyo worshippers and atheist-humanist freethinkers. We might not share the same opinions about what to find in heaven or if there is even a heaven, but we will for sure find a modus vivendi on which we are able to cooperate on a common political standpoint on the religious question, how to decrease prejudices and which concrete solutions can be brought up to help in shaping our society. Only together we are strong, only together we can benefit society. May the constructive cooperation be a success! Thank you! |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 193 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 148 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Liberalism is the transformation of mankind into cattle." - Friedrich Nietzsche |