We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Introduction of the Strategic Deterrence Doctrine
Details
Submitted by[?]: Vaterländische Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2294
Description[?]:
My Honourable Friends. Our national arsenal of non-conventional weaponry is merely a waste of money unless our strategic doctrine is supported by a threat of immense retaliation to any attack against our beloved Vaterland. The Dundorfian people will no longer tolerate the cowardish stance the current administration represents. We must make it crystal clear that any hostile action towards our interests will be retaliated by every means available. We call for the House to support this proposal and give our people the confidence in the might of our armed forces should the hour of need come. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 680 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 70 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "Politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle |