We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty withdrawl ii
Details
Submitted by[?]: Antepec Independence Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2331
Description[?]:
| We feel that this treaty is an unwarrented foreign entanglement. Apart from Keymon, we are the only signatory to it. AIM is committed to larger 'collective security' arrangements. While we see the value of protecting Keymon, we have to ask what Telamon gets out of it? This treaty merely exposes us to obligations to come to the defence of Keymon without any significant enhancement to our defence. We urge the congress to seriously consider removing this anomoly from our defence commitments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the The Keymon Defence Alliance Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 131 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 42 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood." - Augusto Pinochet |