We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Liberty Initiative[?]
This page contains information about the Liberty Initiative.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Coolieboi55
Nation[?]: Yingdala Datong (Yingdala)
Seats[?] in 大会 (Grand Assembly)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Perhaps the worst thing imaginable is being forced to do something. Imagine for a second: living a life with no choice of your own: you cannot choose to dine on your favourate food, be out at night, or are even restricted from playing Particracy! Take this further, and imagine that you are constantly being attacked by a local bully, who steals your money at a whim, and spends it on what she/he feels is appropriate to make society better. Yes, this is the very vision of life that the members of the Liberty Initiative are most fearful of. Naturally, the aforementioned world is one where the state controls who you as an individual are, and controls your world. What we will always strive for is not necessarily a world of capitalism, or a world of any "ism" for that matter, but a world where no one can force anyone to do anything, unless it violates a loose criminal code: one consensually created by the members of society. Some people have even accused this as being a form of anarchism, which is something that we feel it is closest to, but with the idea of ownership being enforced. But hey, if the whole of society were able to consensually agree to eliminating the concept of ownership, then do it, by all means! In the Liberty Initiative, we believe in the individual. Individuals should be kept free from any oppression: weather it be oppression by other individuals, groups, or even majorities. =============================================== PLATFORM: On Centralization: Hell, the more community representation, the better! Nationalism defies our vision, and would not be enforced. Thus, the most decentralized, community oriented society is the one that we would support. Communities can come up with consensus much easier than a nation! Civil Rights: Whatever does not restrict an individual's ability to do things is hip. Ecology: If people want to live in an ecological wasteland, they can go right ahead. We don't want to, so we will preserve the environment. However, the government should never, ever, EVER be the one to make sure that the environment is protected: It should be left to individuals. Foreign Relations: Nationalism is not what we have in mind, and we feel no need to restrict the mingling between nations. Restriction of any kind for that matter is a bad thing. Government Responsibilities: What government? In our world, there really isn't much of a government, just a legal body. Market: We don't really care, do whatever you want. I guess that makes us "laissez-faire..." Military: Umm...no. Keep that away from us. Unless there's a threat to be bothered with, we don't want to have to do any fighting. If there is a threat, then this is probably the only area that the government is justified in intervening. Morality: Morales are totally and utterly subjective. As a result, they should be left to the individual, and to the government. Religion: "God is dead" -Nietzsche "Nietzsche is dead" -God Wow, who should we believe? To be honest, we really don't care what anyone believes; it should NOT be enforced on anyone else though. Nietzsche's quote is fun though :-) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | high | perfect |
Ecology | moderate skeptic | moderate | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | moderate | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | convinced small government | moderate | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | moderate | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | moderate | perfect |
Religion | moderate secular | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 2365 | 29,206 | 73,370,917 | 0.04 | +0.04 | 0 | 501 | 0.00 | +0 |
July 2368 | 23,735,599 | 66,313,407 | 35.79 | +35.75 | 174 | 501 | 34.73 | +174 |
July 2371 | 35,794,412 | 72,180,780 | 49.59 | +13.80 | 249 | 501 | 49.70 | +75 |
July 2374 | 30,020,446 | 75,482,537 | 39.77 | -9.82 | 202 | 501 | 40.32 | -47 |
July 2377 | 26,775,835 | 73,637,799 | 36.36 | -3.41 | 275 | 749 | 36.72 | +73 |
July 2380 | 20,735,335 | 73,605,299 | 28.17 | -8.19 | 212 | 749 | 28.30 | -63 |
July 2383 | 21,147,835 | 77,929,868 | 27.14 | -1.03 | 203 | 749 | 27.10 | -9 |
July 2386 | 25,758,084 | 78,872,103 | 32.66 | +5.52 | 246 | 749 | 32.84 | +43 |
July 2389 | 17,000,072 | 79,435,064 | 21.40 | -11.26 | 165 | 749 | 22.03 | -81 |
July 2392 | 17,709,235 | 81,020,411 | 21.86 | +0.46 | 167 | 749 | 22.30 | +2 |
July 2395 | 18,812,264 | 80,708,744 | 23.31 | +1.45 | 178 | 749 | 23.77 | +11 |
July 2398 | 17,072,813 | 79,284,542 | 21.53 | -1.78 | 166 | 749 | 22.16 | -12 |
July 2401 | 26,485,881 | 85,500,953 | 30.98 | +9.44 | 235 | 749 | 31.38 | +69 |
July 2404 | 20,190,972 | 83,754,195 | 24.11 | -6.87 | 185 | 749 | 24.70 | -50 |
July 2407 | 15,017,275 | 82,222,746 | 18.26 | -5.84 | 142 | 749 | 18.96 | -43 |
July 2410 | 11,918,128 | 82,653,113 | 14.42 | -3.84 | 112 | 749 | 14.95 | -30 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Liberty Initiative.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Civil Liberation Act | July 4302 | July 4302 | passed | ||
LDP Policy on Strikes | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
LDP Policy on Healthcare | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
LDP Policy on Education | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
Child Labour Act | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
Energy Sector Reform Act | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
Child Benefit Reform Act | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
Liberal Democratic Party Agenda | August 4301 | August 4301 | defeated | ||
Renaming the Forum Newspaper | January 4301 | May 4301 | passed | ||
National Postal Service Act | November 4300 | November 4300 | defeated | ||
An Act to Support Resolution 47 | November 4300 | November 4300 | passed | ||
Economy for the Modern Era Act | November 4300 | November 4300 | defeated | ||
Chemical Act | November 4300 | November 4300 | passed | ||
Broadband Access Act | November 4300 | November 4300 | passed | ||
Declaration of the Fifth Republic Act | July 4300 | July 4300 | passed | ||
Fifth Republic Flag Act | July 4300 | July 4300 | passed | ||
Luxury Tax Reduction Act | January 4300 | June 4300 | defeated | ||
Fifth Republic Act | January 4299 | January 4299 | defeated | ||
Social Liberty Act | January 4299 | January 4299 | passed | ||
Luxury Tax Adjustment Act | November 4298 | November 4298 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician |