We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Hippogonder Party[?]
This page contains information about the Hippogonder Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Hippogonder
Nation[?]: Dorvische Republik (Dorvik)
Seats[?] in Staatsrat (State Council)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
February 5443 | 32,329 | 28,832,999 | 0.11 | +0.11 | 0 | 700 | 0.00 | +0 |
July 5443 | 28,148 | 47,239,116 | 0.06 | -0.05 | 0 | 700 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Hippogonder Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Defence Budget proposal of October 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | defeated | ||
Death Penalty Bill 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | passed | ||
Nationality Bill 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | defeated | ||
Conservative Coalition of October 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | defeated | ||
National Anthem Bill 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | passed | ||
Energy Privatisation Bill 4220 | October 4220 | October 4220 | defeated | ||
Stability Cabinet Proposal | October 4220 | October 4220 | defeated | ||
Regional Gesetz: Civil Rights | September 4220 | February 4222 | defeated | ||
Regional Gesetz: Umwelt | September 4220 | August 4221 | defeated | ||
Police Bill 4220 | July 4220 | July 4220 | passed | ||
Extradition Bill 4220 | July 4220 | July 4220 | passed | ||
PU Unity Cabinet Proposal | July 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Adoption Bill 4220 | June 4220 | July 4220 | passed | ||
Freedom of Information Bill 4220 | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Logical Foreign Working Bill 4220 | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Treaty Withdrawal -- Education for All | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Bill 4220 | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Treaty Withdrawal - The Law of the Sea | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Prisoners of War Bill 4220 | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated | ||
Treaty Withdrawal | June 4220 | July 4220 | defeated |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |