We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Workers Action Front[?]
This page contains information about the Workers Action Front.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: woodpigeon
Nation[?]: Dai Sekouokoku (Seko)
Seats[?] in 国会 - Kokkai (Imperial Diet) [?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
One War! Class War! |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
January 2451 | 50,373 | 74,331,718 | 0.07 | +0.07 | 0 | 599 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Workers Action Front.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Compulsory Education Act 2908 | October 2908 | October 2908 | passed | ||
Vaccination Act 2908 | October 2908 | October 2908 | passed | ||
Sekowo Day Act 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Value Added Tax Act 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of September 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of September 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Sekowan Investment Act 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Foreign Aid Act 2905 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Administrative Capitals Act 2908 (Amended) | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Administrative Capitals Act 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of September 2908 | September 2908 | September 2908 | passed | ||
Public Decency Act (2909) | August 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Clean Lungs Act (2909) | August 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Secular Act (2909) | August 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Anti-Queerness Act (2909) | August 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, August 2908 | August 2908 | August 2908 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of July 2908 | July 2908 | July 2908 | passed | ||
Down with capitalism (2909) | March 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Anti-Strike Act (2909) | March 2908 | January 2909 | defeated | ||
Protectionist Act (2909) | March 2908 | January 2909 | defeated |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |