We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
改良派 (Reformists) 🐉[?]
This page contains information about the 改良派 (Reformists) 🐉.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Arapaima35
Nation[?]: Yingdala Datong (Yingdala)
Seats[?] in 大会 (Grand Assembly)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Luthori: Reformists Indralan: 改良派 Transliteration: Gǎiliáng pài The Reformists are a classical liberal, libertarian political organisation that supports major privatisation, and the removal of government in both social and economic means. The Party was co-founded by economist Jin Jianhong, with close political ally, and friend the now retired General Xun Fen. Disgruntled at the centre-left establishment running the show, they created the party so to advocate 免于政府, or "Freedom from Government". Main Political Positions: The Abolition of all State-Funded Healthcare Programmes: The Reformists, as strong individualists, believe that no healthcare should be paid for by the government, and that funding for abortions and pharmaceuticals should be withdrawn. They are agree with people's rights to have full access to healthcare, however they believe that the government is not the right body to give them that right. If they cannot pay, look for support through charity. Striking Laws: Currently within Indrala, workers who go on strike cause too much of a meltdown. Whilst the Reformists recognise the importance of striking, they also view the current easy laws on workers as unproductive, and unfair for both the employer and the employee. By making it harder to strike, business booms and the employee will be looked upon more favourably by his or her employer. Greater Self-Interest in Regards to Foreign Affairs: Currently we spend through the roof when it comes to foreign aid. This should not be the case. Whilst we have a moral duty to assist those in need, we must not forget our own citizens - something the establishment have a tendency to do. Our plan will introduce border control, as well as tied-aid to nations wanting our help. We will not let other nations suck us dry. Fully Privatise Energy: Self-explanatory. Private companies should be given the energy sector in its entirety. The government is too unreliable, and should be allowing private companies do a job that they can perform a lot better than the government can. By competitively contracting private firms to manage energy, we can ensure through free market means, that Indralans have high quality, low cost energy provided for them. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | limited | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | close to none | perfect |
Military | fanatical militarist | close to none | perfect |
Morality | convinced progressive | limited | perfect |
Religion | moderate religious | limited | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 4309 | 5,304,422 | 58,980,518 | 8.99 | +8.99 | 60 | 668 | 8.98 | +60 |
July 4310 | 9,141,799 | 55,436,246 | 16.49 | +7.50 | 108 | 668 | 16.17 | +48 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the 改良派 (Reformists) 🐉.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Secular Act III (UHT) | October 2497 | October 2497 | defeated | ||
Secular Act II (UHT) | October 2497 | October 2497 | defeated | ||
Liberal Bill (UHT) | January 2497 | May 2498 | defeated | ||
Secular Act (UHT) | December 2496 | October 2497 | passed | ||
Propose a cabinet to the legislature - AGAIN LDPI, AGAIN! | December 2496 | December 2496 | defeated | ||
Economic Subsidies (UHT) | July 2496 | June 2497 | passed | ||
Housing Bill (UHT) | July 2496 | June 2497 | passed | ||
Organ Consent (UHT) | July 2496 | June 2497 | defeated | ||
State Religion Bill | May 2496 | May 2496 | defeated | ||
Retaliation Bill | October 2495 | April 2496 | defeated | ||
Mandated Service Act | October 2495 | April 2496 | defeated | ||
Anti-Military Bill II (UHT) | June 2495 | June 2495 | defeated | ||
Propose a cabinet to the legislature | April 2495 | April 2496 | defeated | ||
The national refugee policy | April 2495 | April 2496 | defeated | ||
Religious Regulation II (UHT) | January 2495 | June 2495 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 2494 | November 2494 | November 2494 | passed | ||
Civil Confidence III (UHT) | November 2494 | November 2494 | passed | ||
Civil Confidence II (UHT) | November 2494 | November 2494 | passed | ||
Agriculture Regulation II (UHT) | July 2494 | July 2494 | defeated | ||
Civil Confidence Amendment (UHT) | May 2494 | November 2494 | defeated |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "If liberty and equality, as is thought by some are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost." - Aristotle |