We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
The Conservative Party[?]
This page contains information about the The Conservative Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Konfederatioun vun de Vereente Communautéiten (Keymon)
Seats[?] in National Assembly[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
What we stand for: • Immigrants must financially support themselves and their dependents for 5 years. This means private education and private housing - they should pay into the pot before they take out of it. • No to Political Correctness - it stifles free speech. We are a patriotic party that will stand up for the nation at all costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHAIRMAN'S Current Party Chairman: Ben Chadwick (March 3273 - Present) AGE : 52 Past Party Chairman's: 1. Robert Walters (3270 - March 3273) - RESIGNED Aged 66 REASON FOR RESIGNATION - Too Old --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARTY LEADERS Current Party Leader: Jake Sleeth (3270 - Present) Past Party Leaders: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate isolationist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | limited | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | limited | perfect |
Military | convinced militarist | close to none | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | limited | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 3673 | 547,473 | 5,788,043 | 9.46 | +9.46 | 21 | 230 | 9.13 | +21 |
July 3678 | 351,324 | 5,992,113 | 5.86 | -3.60 | 13 | 230 | 5.65 | -8 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the The Conservative Party.
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |