We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Popular Action Party 인기있는 행동[?]
This page contains information about the Popular Action Party 인기있는 행동.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Great Bae (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Senate of Great Bae[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
인기있는 행동 (Ingiissneun-Haengdong) Popular Action Party Partido de la Acción Popular The Popular Action Party is a centre-right political party in Dankuk. It was founded in 4139 by a group of free market intellectuals, representatives of small&medium sized enterprises and professionals' organisations. It was founded primarily in reaction to the long established social corporatist economic model. Over time however the "old forces" of protection, conservatism and nationalism took over the party and by the mid 4150's, the PAP was considered to be more of a national liberal party. IDEOLOGY - National liberalism - Meritocracy - Non-interventionism - Dovanian values - Social conservatism (minority faction) LEADERSHIP Chairman: Mariano Lee Chong Secretary-General: Rhys Yates Floor Leader: Ryu Dae Moon STRUCTURE FACTIONS The party's generally united in its economic platform, with a few exceptions such as free trade and monopolies law. It is however much more divided on social and cultural issues, with several faction holding divergent views, particularly on the thorny issue of immigration.The great faction is the national liberal faction which is also economically liberal, with a few exceptions such as trade and monopolies. It is nationalist and rejects what it views to be the once dominant market liberals' lack of patriotism. A large conservative faction is also to be found and is hardly distinguishable from the national liberals except for its ever less liberal economic policies, favouring old school corporatism. Small market and social liberal factions are also represented in the party. LIST OF CHAIRMEN Park Yoon-dae (4139) Ahn Jae-Sung (4139-4146) Lee Bo Kwan (4146-4154) Mariano Lee Chong (4154-present) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | laissez-faire-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | high | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
- The Society for Intellectual and Cultural Advancement (SICA)
- Parties for the Promotion of National Languages
- Liberal Representative Organization
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
July 3445 | 14,480,070 | 61,724,279 | 23.46 | +23.46 | 164 | 699 | 23.46 | +164 |
July 3449 | 4,222,310 | 61,642,916 | 6.85 | -16.61 | 47 | 699 | 6.72 | -117 |
February 3452 | 2,220,889 | 61,081,929 | 3.64 | -3.21 | 12 | 400 | 3.00 | -35 |
July 3455 | 3,275,953 | 52,342,536 | 6.26 | +2.62 | 24 | 400 | 6.00 | +12 |
January 3456 | 5,326,650 | 50,631,625 | 10.52 | +4.26 | 42 | 400 | 10.50 | +18 |
July 3458 | 5,990,717 | 53,983,961 | 11.10 | +0.58 | 45 | 400 | 11.25 | +3 |
January 3461 | 4,979,883 | 62,762,102 | 7.93 | -3.16 | 31 | 400 | 7.75 | -14 |
April 3472 | 7,217,387 | 62,463,648 | 11.55 | +3.62 | 46 | 399 | 11.53 | +15 |
September 3472 | 7,587,322 | 64,359,881 | 11.79 | +0.23 | 48 | 399 | 12.03 | +2 |
September 3476 | 15,904,246 | 60,672,261 | 26.21 | +14.42 | 106 | 399 | 26.57 | +58 |
December 3523 | 13,273,994 | 64,828,848 | 20.48 | -5.74 | 83 | 399 | 20.80 | -23 |
December 3527 | 17,792,530 | 61,864,821 | 28.76 | +8.28 | 118 | 399 | 29.57 | +35 |
December 3531 | 13,875,738 | 56,231,832 | 24.68 | -4.08 | 101 | 399 | 25.31 | -17 |
October 3534 | 8,358,467 | 62,991,193 | 13.27 | -11.41 | 54 | 399 | 13.53 | -47 |
September 3538 | 8,212,361 | 67,257,453 | 12.21 | -1.06 | 49 | 399 | 12.28 | -5 |
March 4139 | 11,494,228 | 11,494,228 | 100.00 | +87.79 | 250 | 250 | 100.00 | +201 |
March 4144 | 15,912,757 | 39,487,222 | 40.30 | -59.70 | 101 | 250 | 40.40 | -149 |
March 4149 | 23,505,565 | 60,078,923 | 39.12 | -1.17 | 95 | 250 | 38.00 | -6 |
March 4154 | 18,460,868 | 65,010,496 | 28.40 | -10.73 | 70 | 250 | 28.00 | -25 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Popular Action Party 인기있는 행동.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Religion reform | February 3241 | February 3241 | passed | ||
Military reform | February 3241 | February 3241 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 3240 | October 3240 | October 3240 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of August 3239 | August 3239 | August 3239 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of August 3238 | August 3238 | August 3238 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of August 3237 | August 3237 | August 3237 | defeated | ||
Ecological and Religious Bill | August 3237 | August 3237 | passed | ||
Our history should not be forgotten. | February 3235 | September 3250 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of February 3235 | February 3235 | October 3240 | passed | ||
Important changes in tax, February 3235 | February 3235 | October 3240 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of November 3233 | November 3233 | November 3233 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of March 3233 | March 3233 | March 3233 | passed | ||
National Military Policy | February 3233 | February 3233 | passed | ||
Common Bill Changing Act | February 3233 | February 3233 | passed | ||
The Administrative Bill | February 3232 | February 3232 | defeated | ||
The Military Bill | February 3232 | February 3232 | passed | ||
Tax Changing Bill | August 3231 | August 3231 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of April 3231 | April 3231 | April 3231 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of October 3230 | October 3230 | October 3230 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of October 3230 | October 3230 | October 3230 | passed |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |