We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Cascadian Socialist Party[?]
This page contains information about the Cascadian Socialist Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Jumhuriat al-Badara (Badara)
Seats[?] in Majlis al-Nuwaab (Council of Representatives)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
December 2341 | 51,759 | 58,510,342 | 0.09 | +0.09 | 0 | 750 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Cascadian Socialist Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Withdraw I | October 3695 | December 3695 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, October 3695 | October 3695 | October 3695 | passed | ||
Less to the Cabinet | August 3695 | January 3698 | passed | ||
Ratification of the Treaty of Cyneƿīseceaster | August 3695 | September 3697 | passed | ||
Ratification of the Treaty of Gongmangdo | August 3695 | December 3695 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of the year of 3695 | August 3695 | August 3695 | passed | ||
Country Improvements II | June 3695 | December 3695 | passed | ||
Country Improvement I | June 3695 | December 3695 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, June 3695 | June 3695 | June 3695 | passed | ||
The Sultan is Dead Long Live The New Sultan | September 3694 | November 3694 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, September 3694 | September 3694 | September 3694 | passed | ||
Reforming the Government II | August 3694 | October 3694 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 3694 | May 3694 | May 3694 | defeated | ||
Proposal of April 3694 | April 3694 | October 3694 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of April 3694 | April 3694 | April 3694 | passed | ||
Law Instituting Child Labour | March 3694 | October 3694 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, March 3694 | March 3694 | April 3694 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of March 3694 | March 3694 | March 3694 | passed | ||
Reform the Government | February 3694 | October 3694 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of February 3694 | February 3694 | February 3694 | defeated |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |