We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Concerned Union of Fascists[?]
This page contains information about the Concerned Union of Fascists.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: F Urquhart
Nation[?]: Republic of Likatonia (Likatonia)
Seats[?] in Congress of the Republic[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Concerned Union of Fascists.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Religion | May 2534 | May 2534 | passed | ||
Federal Representation System | January 2534 | January 2534 | defeated | ||
Local Control of the Woods | January 2534 | January 2534 | passed | ||
Foreign Policies Act | January 2534 | January 2534 | defeated | ||
Local Control of the Population | January 2534 | January 2534 | defeated | ||
Manifesto of 2534 | January 2534 | January 2534 | defeated | ||
Foreign Policy(part 2) | December 2533 | March 2534 | defeated | ||
Hard-Line | November 2533 | November 2533 | defeated | ||
Foreign Policy (Part 1) | November 2533 | November 2533 | passed | ||
Justice | November 2533 | November 2533 | passed | ||
. | November 2533 | November 2533 | passed | ||
Economics | September 2533 | September 2533 | defeated | ||
Death Penalty | June 2533 | June 2533 | passed | ||
Industry | June 2533 | June 2533 | passed | ||
Banks | June 2533 | June 2533 | defeated | ||
Health Care | June 2533 | June 2533 | defeated | ||
End of Conscription | June 2533 | June 2533 | defeated | ||
Defence Industries | June 2533 | June 2533 | defeated | ||
End to racism | June 2533 | June 2533 | passed | ||
Likatonia, Free | May 2533 | May 2533 | defeated |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |