We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Royal Socialist Party of Hulstria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2358
Description[?]:
| another change that i wish, now i would like the legislatvie assembly to be reffered to as national assembly, but i'll leave it debate for any other suggestions and the regions, i know state is strange, but i dont want that so im leavin in debate |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Central Diet
Current: Parlament/Gikai
Proposed: National Assembly
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The official title of subnational entities, also known as regions.
Old value:: Prefecture
Current: Region/Chiiki
Proposed: State
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:17:16, February 02, 2007 CET | From |  Kaiserliche Hulsterreichische Partei | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | Sorry But the Central Diet is my brain child I just plan dont like state. |
| Date | 08:40:42, February 02, 2007 CET | From | Refuge Pressure Party | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | Although Nat Ass and state aren't quite original enough I'd vote for this because, as IHP knows, I fought long and hard against "Diet" (and lost!) |
| Date | 21:25:40, February 02, 2007 CET | From | Royal Socialist Party of Hulstria | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | well being the one who propsed this I do like National Assembly, but as I said, I really dont like state either so put up some suggestions for it |
| Date | 21:29:38, February 02, 2007 CET | From | Royal Socialist Party of Hulstria | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | and another thing where did we get then name "Central Diet"? |
| Date | 23:41:44, February 02, 2007 CET | From | Refuge Pressure Party | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | IHP tried to get it for a long time, first they wanted Federal Diet then Central Diet - eventually they got the GSPP's support and it got done. |
| Date | 04:26:14, February 05, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | What because I'm gone your gonna drop this debate? I am ashamed of you all? ): |
| Date | 10:30:55, February 05, 2007 CET | From | Refuge Pressure Party | To | Debating the National Reforms |
| Message | Because with you gone the IHP know they don't have the votes anymore. Still think we should do the Phoenix thing though |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 370 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 303 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 77 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress." - John Clapham |