We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Decency Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Exiled Centrist Coalition
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2355
Description[?]:
| We believe that certain restrictions must be put in place to prevent certain forms of public indecency from occuring. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:03:09, February 04, 2007 CET | From | Royal Party | To | Debating the Public Decency Reforms |
| Message | This is bullshit. How can we keep the population rate if people arenīt allowed to... express..... their love in parks and the subway etc? |
| Date | 22:11:28, February 04, 2007 CET | From | Exiled Centrist Coalition | To | Debating the Public Decency Reforms |
| Message | They would still be allowed to express their love in public, just not in a manner that could be rather...uncomfortable...to everyone around them. Besides, most citizens I know would not want younger children to be exposed to sex while they're, say, at the playground. |
| Date | 23:51:38, February 04, 2007 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Public Decency Reforms |
| Message | We can support both articles. |
| Date | 09:23:51, February 05, 2007 CET | From | Royal Party | To | Debating the Public Decency Reforms |
| Message | Where do you draw the line for "...uncomfortable...."? Quite a... personal.... matter of taste in this issue.... ;-) |
| Date | 16:56:43, February 05, 2007 CET | From | Social Conservative Party | To | Debating the Public Decency Reforms |
| Message | We will support both articles, as those whom are eager to express their love in public are free to do so in their colonies. There is no meaning of the rest of us having a perfectly nice meal spoiled by nude obesities. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 145 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 258 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 97 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |