We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gun Act 2082
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2083
Description[?]:
| We propose some restrictions in purchasing guns to prevent crimes |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Proposed: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:19:28, July 19, 2005 CET | From |  Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Gun Act 2082 |
| Message | Against. Civil rights issue, |
| Date | 13:34:04, July 19, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Gun Act 2082 |
| Message | Fundamental civil right is right to live ! |
| Date | 15:25:11, July 19, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Gun Act 2082 |
| Message | Just because people own guns does not mean they are going to go round killing people. |
| Date | 09:30:26, July 20, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Gun Act 2082 |
| Message | The state of fear generated by these guns are a situation leading over many lives of the tiny ordinary people ... it is fear because they are not free entirely free to use guns, not because they have too many guns ... An example, why a sane guy should suffer an injury from a drunk or mentally ill on the streets ... but in a pub? Well, you know why you are there ... you should find a friend then to take you home ... in jail, you know why you are there ... when you will be out of jail you will have to pay God to find the Judge ... in a sanatorium for mentally ill people ... you knwo why you are there ... and I don't think it is wise to get back on the streets ... the state of fear belongs to who organizes it so streamed against the people from the streets that there are no streets but fears. ... of course, of unuseable guns, most of the times ... People did not learned the need of respect in the past XXst century, and people do not know how to defend ... but the laws know how to keep them TINY. I think that no gun killed other than at least too much impetuos and intempestive guys, if not vulgarious mad senile jerks from their joungle of ineducated fouls ... which happens to be like many of us "ineducated" on the fields of supreme respect on anyone who we meet, no matter how he is dressed, but counting on how he speaks or sings ... Just my opinion! The guns should be here and there but not everywhere ... the best distribution of guns is: one square with guns, one square without guns ... so on till the education gets by far more significance in the people's life. Now about this law: the current one says "private individuals" this expressed a century ago that the private is an adult ... a child or a young could not have such privacy rights or it was not even considered for rights yet ... The law says "Adults individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely" ... under the statement that a world with guns, a square with guns in the world generates opression from mafiotic new gangs and orgs, while people have guns, but not quite as many rights to use them against who deserves it ... it comes as a necessity to predict that a restriction in this law will help to empower the current already in place, created orgs and gangs from the new gangs which may come tomorrow to take their places ... on one hand the more power gangs have now means the less for the traditional state power ... on the other hand the power of the cultural revolution offered by USA movies specially for gangs members will teach them how the ordinary people is who does not have the rights to wear a gun and gangs will not let you have one or will kill you just for having a gun (your own) on their streets ... You don't believe me? Believe ecstasy! Under current game conditions we are enforced to vote NO! No for "strict license conditions" ... meaning just "you are not in my gang man, I can't sell you a gun or if I do they'll kill me too". |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 111 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 237 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 147 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "God creates men, but they choose each other." - Niccolo Machiavelli |