We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Titles
Details
Submitted by[?]: Royal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2358
Description[?]:
| This sounds more formal... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Auriga
Current: Πρόεδρος της Δημοκρατίας - President of the Republic
Proposed: His/Her Royal Highness The Holy Emperor/Empress of The Indipendent Wantuni Republic
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:00:46, February 08, 2007 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Titles |
| Message | We cannot support. The Federalists urge the Conclave to keep Wantuni a Constitutional Republic. |
| Date | 17:00:06, February 09, 2007 CET | From | Social Conservative Party | To | Debating the Titles |
| Message | We find it odd to have a head of state, of a republic. Whom is a monarch.. Perhaps it would be wiser, if this is to be passed, to change the republic ? Is that what the royal party desires ? |
| Date | 21:47:22, February 09, 2007 CET | From | Okono Party | To | Debating the Titles |
| Message | We can't support either. The Okono Party believes that Wantuni's history should be preserved. |
| Date | 07:47:58, February 10, 2007 CET | From | Axis Neopanterran Wantun Party | To | Debating the Titles |
| Message | Far to politically correct for our tastes. |
| Date | 07:48:29, February 10, 2007 CET | From | Axis Neopanterran Wantun Party | To | Debating the Titles |
| Message | 'Owever, we approve of the monarchial spirit. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 90 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 302 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 108 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Once again, we will wage war against fascism, only this time a civil war of words and politics." - Vladimir Borisov, former Trigunian politician |