We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Spanking monkies does not make children.
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Feminazi Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2358
Description[?]:
| In order to ensure our land retains the virtue and purity moving into the 'Golden age' that the LFFR wants to bring, we ask the Convocation to stop the decadence of of society, namely pornography. It is exploitative of people at a base level, as well as a seriously corrupting influence. While some will scream civil rights, we ask for the rights of the people this industry expoloits to be guarded. Outlaw this unecessay industry please. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: All forms of pornography are illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:35:10, February 09, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Spanking monkies does not make children. |
| Message | We do not feel that this industry exploits people: Note "depicting consenting adults." It's a crime if those it depicts don't consent, or are not adults. If they consent, then at the least they don't feel exploited. |
| Date | 19:17:31, February 09, 2007 CET | From |  Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Spanking monkies does not make children. |
| Message | Consent is sometimes obtained through financial pressures. Are those who work in sweatshops by cconsent not exploited? Again, the LFFR go further than we can stomach, so we must oppose. |
| Date | 00:56:03, February 10, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Spanking monkies does not make children. |
| Message | Those who work in sweatshops by consent are exploited, but that's why there are workplace regulations that, in the case of sweatshops, are most notable for enforcing a minimum wage and maximum working hours. That is also the reason that the PLPL is strongly pro-union. However, consenting adults that make pornography are choosing to do so as what they deem their best option. Obviously the same workplace regulations that apply to anyone else should apply to them-- and do. We therefore believe they should be allowed to choose that profession. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 67 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "We are told that this is an odious and unpopular tax. I never knew a tax that was not odious and unpopular with the people who paid it." - John Sherman |