Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5480
Next month in: 03:49:34
Server time: 20:10:25, May 07, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pro-Unionist Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Public Employees

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2357

Description[?]:

For the workers!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:21:32, February 09, 2007 CET
FromGreen Freedom Party
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageWe definitely support article 3, and largely support article 1. We do view article 2 as a bit extreme, but we will support anyway.

Date11:23:30, February 09, 2007 CET
FromNational Conservative Conference
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageWe cannot accept such ludicrous legislation. If you wish the industry and economy of this nation to slip and fail,then vote yes and let the workers run amok. We need a firm hand on rebellious workers.

Date12:44:57, February 09, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Anarcho-Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageEmployers do work too you know. More so than the mindless laborers they employ.

Date13:12:05, February 09, 2007 CET
From Democratic Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageWe agree with the PCPD, this bill would be a huge blow for our nation's economy. The amount of investments would collapse, insecurity amongst enterpreuners raise significantly and major enterprises would start preparations for leaving this country to move somewhere else where hard working, enterpreunership & individuality are respected.

This bill would also cause huge increase in bureaucracy where ALL (?) employers would have to ask government's permission to fire workers, no matter if the enterprise is on the brink of bankruptcy!

Date13:21:55, February 09, 2007 CET
FromNoordelijk Bevrijding Front
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageToo many proposals

Date02:22:19, February 10, 2007 CET
FromUnion of Public Employees
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageThree is too many?

Date03:36:44, February 10, 2007 CET
From Democratic Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the Pro-Unionist Reform
MessageIt's more likely to get bills passed the lesser number of proposals they include.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 118

no
    

Total Seats: 181

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83