We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Strategic Initiative Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Work-Shy Elements
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2084
Description[?]:
| The Kundrati Senate resolves to enter into diplomatic talks with the Kirlawa Confederacy, Dundorf Federation, Commonwealth of Luthori and the Beluzian Republic for the purpose of establishing bilateral mutual defence alliances. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:08:18, July 20, 2005 CET | From | Union of Work-Shy Elements | To | Debating the Strategic Initiative Act |
| Message | If we are attacked, we are right now completely alone, so we need some PROPER allies. It won't be wrapped up in some wishy-washy inter-government bodies. It will just be an alliance where one will come to the aid of the other. I suggest Kirlawa Confederacy, Dundorf Federation, Commonwealth of Luthori and the Beluzian Republic to name but a few. |
| Date | 20:27:04, July 20, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Strategic Initiative Act |
| Message | Hmmm... on the one hand, we would very much prefer to refrain from binding ourselves to any outside nation. We are the "Isolationist" party after all. On the other hand, that would mean Kundrati would have to embark on a massive programme of miltarization, to be able to defend itself without outside help. On the gripping hand, we feel that this would waste large amounts of cash needed elsewhere, and thus is worse than the alternative. The worst alternative is of course doing nothing and getting overrun by another nation. So, yes, we'll support this. The nations mentioned seem to be a reasonable choice. |
| Date | 23:02:55, July 20, 2005 CET | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Strategic Initiative Act |
| Message | anything that allows us to become more international is good to me |
| Date | 02:57:23, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Strategic Initiative Act |
| Message | We will support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 223 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |