We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Consolidation of National Security Act 2359
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Public Employees
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2362
Description[?]:
As a result of the recent terrorist bombing in Langton, we propose the consolidation and merger of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Defence, and Justice into one monolithic organization equipped to counter and defend from all threats plaguing Dorvik, whether it be internal or external. In light of this tragic incident, one monolithic organization would be much more capable, with more resources and the capabilities to share intelligence without any possible mis-communications. And so we propose to create the Ministry of Central Security, devoted to maintain security of our great nation. OOC: This will work like this, each Ministry that has been consolidated with count as a third of the leadership in the Ministry of Central Security. The cabinet member you have as the former Minister of Justice would be considered a leader or bureaucrat in the MCS. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:11:29, February 14, 2007 CET | From | ![]() | To | Debating the Consolidation of National Security Act 2359 |
Message | We don't see that it's essential to mix up governmental responsibilities, we just have to consolidate cooperation & communication between these three departments. |
Date | 19:13:24, February 14, 2007 CET | From | Union of Public Employees | To | Debating the Consolidation of National Security Act 2359 |
Message | Several tragicincidents have occurred. Including the spread of Dundorfian bird flu. For the insterests of national security we believe that consolidation of these three ministries would be in the best interests of Dorvik. |
Date | 13:36:33, February 16, 2007 CET | From | National Movement | To | Debating the Consolidation of National Security Act 2359 |
Message | Creating a more limbersome, big dept. will not solve anything, but cause more porblems. I agree, communication needs to be looked at, but a huge dept. will be worse |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 61 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 216 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 22 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford |
Warning: session_destroy() [function.session-destroy]: Session object destruction failed in /var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/footer.php on line 40