We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Better the Mice than Men
Details
Submitted by[?]: Justice League of Cildania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2365
Description[?]:
| Okay, so this one time Poison Ivy came up with mind-controlling lipstick, and tricked Batman into making out with her. Bats was her slave for like a month, and I had to heat-vision his Batjet just so he'd stop attacking the Justice League Watchtower... the guy was totally whipped. Turned out Ivy sold the lipstick at Macy's, and we had to go around stopping all these crime sprees without hurting any men, because it wasn't really their fault. So I'm thinking, if that lipstick was first tested on animals, and someone noticed the mice were doing all the rabbit's biddings, it would never have sold at Macy's and no mind-controlling would have gone on. Doesn't seem very nice to the cute little mice, but my buddy The Atom, who's a bigshot scientist, told me that those mice are bred specifically for cosmetic testing, and if there was no testing, the mice wouldn't even exist. More cute mice and less harmful cosmetics for people, sounds like win win! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:06:05, February 20, 2007 CET | From |  Divine Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Better the Mice than Men |
| Message | We cannot agree with either of these, if people want to test their cosmentics (as they should, for their own business' sake) then they can pay PEOPLE to test them. Scientific research occasionally needs to use animal testing, where there is reason to believe that testing on humans might be harmful, so we regulate it slightly. |
| Date | 19:17:13, February 20, 2007 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Better the Mice than Men |
| Message | We cannot agree to either of these. |
| Date | 19:18:29, February 20, 2007 CET | From | Justice League of Cildania | To | Debating the Better the Mice than Men |
| Message | Hm okay, but harmful cosmetics can do some pretty gross and dangerous things to people, even kill them (and I bet nobody signs up to die from mascara). Plus you don't breed people for the specific purpose of testing cosmetics on them, that would kinda violate the whole right to life deal. It's just a whole lot safer and easier with animals, I don't understand why you wouldn't let research or cosmetic companies use them first? |
| Date | 13:17:45, February 22, 2007 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Better the Mice than Men |
| Message | Why not shoot down the cosmetic companies? Aren't they the real enemies here? No need to punish the poor bunnies coz some sluts feel like they can't live without the perfect eyeliner is there? |
| Date | 07:28:28, February 25, 2007 CET | From | Justice League of Cildania | To | Debating the Better the Mice than Men |
| Message | Poor bunnies? You mean the bunnies that wouldn't exist would be okay and instead you support the horrible accidents that occur from people-testing? ugh. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 316 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
| Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown |