We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Age
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2367
Description[?]:
| We wish to retire people earlier, for them to have a long and happy retirment as well as allowing the young more places of work. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 60
Proposed: 62
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:24:43, February 20, 2007 CET | From | Royal Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age |
| Message | But what about GDP when they quit working earlier? |
| Date | 17:33:51, February 20, 2007 CET | From | Social Conservative Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age |
| Message | GDP will be GNP, GNI will Enhance the HDI, and the HDI will make BBC happy that we are AOK. |
| Date | 18:52:14, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age |
| Message | We oppose. With life expectancy what it is, 65 is a perfect retirement age. |
| Date | 23:56:12, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Social Conservative Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age |
| Message | Tell me, why is 65 a perfect retirement age ? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 162 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 230 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 108 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal |