Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 03:14:15
Server time: 12:45:44, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): echizen | ImperialLodamun | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!

Details

Submitted by[?]: Black People's Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2364

Description[?]:

"We, the elected representatives of the Five Nations of Lodamun, having consulted the people we represent, and after full consideration, resolve that our nation shall NOT, at this time, enter into negotiations to form a 'Greater Likatonia' alliance or empire.

Furthermore, we resolve that we shall resist any attempt to forcably coerce such an alliance, by whatever means are required."

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:02:48, February 21, 2007 CET
FromOrange Liberty Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
Messageagreed.

Date10:32:28, February 21, 2007 CET
FromEdelweiss Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageWe agree.

Date11:26:50, February 21, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageDisagree.

Date23:08:05, February 21, 2007 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageSo your the party that agrees with this imperialist idea I heard about...

Date10:11:38, February 22, 2007 CET
FromNational Freedom
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageAgree

Date12:34:07, February 22, 2007 CET
FromMachiavellian Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageDisagree

Date12:44:51, February 22, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageBPP try and talk sense rather than ranting madly about something the BPP appear to know little of. We have discussed certain issues with some Likatonian Parties, and we have looked at the history of the "Greater Likatonia" movement. The Greater Likatonia movement claims territory in Valruzia, West Meria and Northern Hukatai, theoretically it does not claim any territory in Lodamun, Lodamun is considered an equal partner in such an organisation. In effect if Greater Likatonia were to come into practice, our power would be significantly increased, our economy would gain advantages in new markets that it couldn't enjoy otherwise.

For too long Lodamun has been a backward nation ruled by a one party dictatorship without any role in International Affairs whatsoever. We feel it is time for Lodamun to realise its destiny in the International sphere particularly in our continent of Seleya. It is only fair that we take this opporunity to consider working as an equal partner with those Likatonia parties that advocate greater things for our nations.

Date13:16:47, February 22, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageWe said Ustase. Very well said. We admire the courage of Ustase and the Machiavellian Party in standing up to the BPP dictators.

Date14:27:03, February 22, 2007 CET
FromEdelweiss Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageThis resolution is meant to reject the text about a 'Greater Likatonia', recently written by the Likatonian Conservative Liberal Party, adressed to our Nation, which includes the Nation of Lodamun, however with no clear intelligence concerning that matter. So, for that reason, we will still support this resolution.

Date22:05:18, February 22, 2007 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageYou ramble on thinking that I was calling you a traitor or something...there is nothing wrong with you disagreeing, i just want a seperate nation...not Greater Likatonia. On one of Likatonia's bills, one of the parties(I forgot the name) said that a Lodamunian party publically announced an agreement to the Greater Likatonia idea, which at the time was wrong, i had to create this bill to find out. It was more of a suprised way of how I said it.

Date22:12:28, February 22, 2007 CET
FromOrange Liberty Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageNot sure if you've noticed, but Ustase has a thing about rambling.

Date22:19:31, February 22, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageThe BPP think that several lines is rambling? Again, what the BPP says makes little sense, we urge them to remain silent and to continue doing as the OLP do.

The OLP is a party that lies through its teeth, It is perhaps the second worst excuse for a political party in Lodamun, narrowly behind the BPP, and now considers debate to be rambling?

Date03:44:36, February 23, 2007 CET
FromOrange Liberty Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageWhen did the OLP lie, for reference?

Date12:08:54, February 23, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageBy suggesting the Ustate voted against a privitisation Bill that had never actually been put forwards.

Date14:51:59, February 23, 2007 CET
FromOrange Liberty Party
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageThe OLP regrets the misunderstanding caused by innacurately referring to a decentralization bill as a privatization bill, even though both would have removed said power from the central government, which was the point we were trying to make at the time.

Thank you for nit-picking incessantly abount unimportant things.

Matthew Mittelstadt
Vice President, Orange Liberty Party

Date11:41:21, February 24, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Say "NO" to Greater Likatonia!
MessageNot really. The OLP claimed we voted against the Bill that they never actually put forward, yet the case is we backed the Bill they put forward concerning the matter. It is not nit-picking it is merely refuting a lie.

However the OLP are surely not adverse to nit-picking about unimportant matters, and much of the recent debate as concerned such unimportant matters, debates the OLP have been more than happy to speak in.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 438

no
  

Total Seats: 312

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

    Random quote: "You don't have to explain something you never said." - Calvin Coolidge

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 82