We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious symbols
Details
Submitted by[?]: Royal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2364
Description[?]:
| We believe that religious symbols in a way can offend people if seen in these sir com stances. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:32:34, February 21, 2007 CET | From | Social Conservative Party | To | Debating the Religious symbols |
| Message | supported |
| Date | 15:17:46, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Solentian Thought Police | To | Debating the Religious symbols |
| Message | lol, "sir com stances" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 316 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 142 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." - Ronald Reagan |