We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The National Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldegar Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2383
Description[?]:
| The True Conservative Party, in the interests of best protecting our great nation and people from all threats of terrorism and war crime, proposes this bill to allow our National Intelligence Agency all rights to undertake any form of operation in any other country. This will allow optimum protection for our nation, and will allow our Intelligence to stop terrorism at the roots, before it even arrives in this nation. The True Conservative Party can see no reason why any other party should find fault or harm in this bill being passed - it ensures only that our nation be better protected from threats of terrorism and invasion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:47:13, February 26, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the The National Security Act |
| Message | The Social Democrats are opposing this bill as it is really unimportant for reasons other than unnecessary showing muscles on the international field. We should strive to be a credible partner on the international level and should focus on international cooperation and solidarity rather than espionage. We suggest this bill be dropped before the vote and rather replaced by something of better use to our Nation. |
| Date | 10:35:32, April 01, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the The National Security Act |
| Message | Can we call it KGB? |
| Date | 00:50:21, April 02, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the The National Security Act |
| Message | Woul those covert operations include overthrowing governments who mean us no harm, but beacuse we don't like their ideas, we cannot coexist with them? |
| Date | 09:51:42, April 02, 2007 CET | From | Greenpeace Party | To | Debating the The National Security Act |
| Message | The structure of this service is not clear. We cannot vote to foavore of a widening of the powers of the intenlligence without to understand who the governments and which it arranges of equilibrium of the powers it exists. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 441 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 91 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 118 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "We must show that liberty is not merely one particular value but that it is the source and condition of most moral values. What a free society offers to the individual is much more than what he would be able to do if only he were free. We can therefore not fully appreciate the value of freedom until we know how a society of free men as a whole differs from one in which unfreedom prevails." - Friedrich August Hayek |