We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Review Foreign policy Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2369
Description[?]:
| Regocnising that the world has changed a lot, and that we constintly have to revisited our foreign policy, we propose |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards giving aid to foreign countries.
Old value:: The government never offers international aid.
Current: The government gives moderate aid to countries in need.
Proposed: The government only gives aid for disaster relief in foreign countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:52:09, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Militant Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Review Foreign policy Bill |
| Message | That disaster relief is funded by theft from individuals. |
| Date | 12:43:44, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Federal Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review Foreign policy Bill |
| Message | Oh, and here I thought you where going to say something new |
| Date | 03:56:58, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Review Foreign policy Bill |
| Message | Yes for majority of bill, no for article 3. I will vote for a repeal of only article 3 if someone proposes it. That is why you should make bills one article at a time, they often get repealed to what the majority wants anyway. |
| Date | 09:32:37, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Federal Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Review Foreign policy Bill |
| Message | In thanks for your support for this bill, we will support such a repeal. We had such a bill up for debate for quite some time, and would have removed article 3 then if so asked, but no debate took place! |
| Date | 09:13:34, March 07, 2007 CET | From | Militant Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Review Foreign policy Bill |
| Message | FSDP: No, we're principled. It makes one rather consistent. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 315 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 285 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: The Wolfsheim Virus is not a real actual disease in the conventional medical sense of the term. Rather, it is a cluster of symptoms which are just part of the general socio-economic disease that is capitalism. The main symptoms the sufferers are experiencing are a direct result of capitalist poverty, as in malnutrition, poor housing and so on, combined with psycho-somatic symptoms which are a direct consequence of the contradictions and stresses which are inherent to the capitalist system. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |