We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2370
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the AM Feminazi Movement
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the 
Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the AM Populist Social Democrats
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the AM Feminazi Movement
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Commonwealth Workers Army
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Commonwealth Workers Army
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the AM Radical Libertarian Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the AM Feminazi Movement
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the AM Populist Social Democrats
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:35:16, March 05, 2007 CET | From | AM Feminazi Movement | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | We feel this is fair. The AM LRM is happy to serve in any position it can. |
| Date | 12:12:43, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | As always, Axis Mundi Revolution is the servant of the will of The People. |
| Date | 15:49:28, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | Dictators |
| Date | 18:32:24, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Civil Liberties Party | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | The people of Likatonia our disgraced today, to see such greedy power mongering take place in the Convocation. Come next election the AM parties will which they had treated us a bit better then this. |
| Date | 23:17:47, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | Curious - the Conservative Liberals and the Civil Liberties Party both agree that Axis Mundi parties have treated other parties unfairly. The curious part is that no such complaints were made by either party when the roles were reversed, and the Axis Mundi parties were being excluded - regardless of the fact that the largest single party in Likatonia is an Axis Mundi party, or that the Emisarry is currently an Axis Mundi appointee. Pure hypocrisy. |
| Date | 23:21:46, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | The CLib parties seem to believe that fair /= equal, and in fact fair=favours parties with the letters C, L, I and B in their names. |
| Date | 23:34:46, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the AM Cabinet Proposal of May 2369 |
| Message | Exactly. There had been no 'Axis Mundi' cabinets suggested, UNTIL a deliberately exclusive cabinet was proposed to discriminate against the AM. Then, when a cabinet is recommended that employs the same tactics in reverse... it is visibly unfair...? Axis Mundi parties have consistently compromised and sought to find solutions. Certain other parties have opposed at every turn. The real question then, is could a united cabinet even be proposed, with 'anti-Axis Mundi' feeling so high among certain parties? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 92 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 75 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: "The only place where democracy comes before work is in the dictionary." - Ralph Nader |