We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: An Act to amend the Competition Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2370
Description[?]:
| Less restriction and demand on markets to increase competition. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: Companies are required to label food and beverage products somewhere on the package.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
Scope of food ingredient labeling (if present).
Old value:: All ingredients and corresponding nutritional information must be listed.
Current: All ingredients and corresponding nutritional information must be listed.
Proposed: All ingredients must be listed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:16:04, March 06, 2007 CET | From |  Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the An Act to amend the Competition Act |
| Message | One thing that the Right is Right Party will not have privatised is our security and police forces. This is not right. |
| Date | 16:10:47, March 06, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the An Act to amend the Competition Act |
| Message | Privatising police forces?! No way! |
| Date | 16:12:48, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the An Act to amend the Competition Act |
| Message | Yes, I think food safety and policing are state tasks. |
| Date | 20:29:23, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the An Act to amend the Competition Act |
| Message | Its out. It wasn't suppose to be in the first place. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 37 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 88 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |