We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Explicit Material Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2370
Description[?]:
| Allow adults to look at nudity if that is what they so desire. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: All forms of pornography are illegal.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:22:53, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Explicit Material Bill |
| Message | As the CDA has stated on similar proposals, that it sees relaxation of anti-pornography laws as the beginning of a slide towards decadence, leading to sexual harassment, adultery, unwanted pregnancies and STD's. The existence of image or TV programs about sex implies that sex is normal in every situation. The CDA considers sex to be a private matter, in which mutual love should be the most important thing. Commercialisation and detaching sex from love through pornography and the TV doesn't fit into this view. Sex on television often does not take place in the context of love but of physical pleasure, making it an expression of physical lust rather than love. |
| Date | 16:30:34, March 06, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Explicit Material Bill |
| Message | There shouldn't be any restrictions here. This doesn't matter to the state. On the other hand we are quite pleased with the way it is right now: Hidden cathouses all over the country, big underground markets of pornographic material, criminal companies whose influence on the people grows more and more... this causes chaos, not in the way we want it but at least it causes chaos, and that's not a bad thing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 37 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 88 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." - H. L. Mencken |