Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 00:49:09
Server time: 03:10:50, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2374

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperium et Libertas Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2374

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:52:30, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageA cabinet for sensible moderation in policies, with the two largest parties taking more positions. (It should be noted that we have only given ourselves one position, in the spirit of unity).

Date02:37:21, March 15, 2007 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageTwo largest, excluding our Imperial friends.. Of course why forsake morality for power? Far too many parties are headed for the Eternal Hellfire.

Date02:58:38, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageThat's a valid point, we obviously meant the largest of those in the proposal. Which, incidentally, contains no Nazi parties. What an odd view of morality you chaps have.

Date08:26:35, March 15, 2007 CET
FromLuthori Tory Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageIgnore it - it's just typical Puritan propaganda - go back to your eternal depravity, Rednecks...

Date10:15:48, March 15, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Justicial Party - Solidarity
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageThis is OK, but we are disappointed that the CDP have not been included, they help serve as a bulwark against extremism.

Date11:53:34, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageWe should make it clear that the CDP were invited to participate but chose to decline, nobly choosing to stay out of power in order to make up part of an effective opposition.

Date16:21:23, March 15, 2007 CET
FromLuthori Tory Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageWhy hasn't this proposal passed? All the required 'yes' votes are in...

Date16:22:46, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageWe were wondering that. Will it pass in the next month?

Date16:27:00, March 15, 2007 CET
FromLuthori Tory Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageHopefully, though if not it should become law by November 2374...

Date16:32:06, March 15, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageI think you cannot pass a government that does not contain the party having the HoS: Look at the proposal by the ILP of government of may 2373. It contains a majority of seats for yes and it did not pass

Date16:35:32, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: I think that was different- an election fell half way through the proposal.

Date16:37:59, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: And technically this bill does automatically contain the Imperials- they chair the cabinet.

Date20:43:28, March 15, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: If this bill technically contains the Imperials then they would have to vote for it in order for it to pass. Just an idea...

Date20:53:31, March 15, 2007 CET
FromFalanges Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
Messageyes true this is what i meant

Date21:05:13, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: Heh, we'll see what happens. (That would strike me as somewhat odd though- it removes the need for the "only the head of state may propose a coalition" option). Another possibility is that one cabinet proposal can't go through until there are no earlier ones on the table.

Date21:13:35, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: I've just asked on the forum- http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=137204&mforum=particracy#137204

Date21:43:24, March 15, 2007 CET
FromImperium et Libertas Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2374
MessageOOC: You were right CDP!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 81

no
    

Total Seats: 74

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

    Random quote: "Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 88