We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Burden Reduction Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of Moderates
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2377
Description[?]:
| This act hopes to decrease the burden upon the federal government and decrease the amount of bureaucratic red tape. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: All sports clubs are government owned and run.
Current: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Proposed: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:24:06, March 18, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | We can agree with this. |
| Date | 22:43:10, March 18, 2007 CET | From | Independent Right | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | We support this 100%, and urge others to do so as well. |
| Date | 11:12:43, March 19, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | The TCP gives their entire support to this bill and will undoubtably vote in favour. |
| Date | 21:11:15, March 19, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | The PM shall put this up for a vote once the lame duck period has ended. |
| Date | 06:26:44, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Left Libertarian Party | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | The LLP does not support full privatisation, and as such cannot support this bill. Co-existence of private and public agencies would have been more acceptable. |
| Date | 22:50:51, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the National Burden Reduction Act |
| Message | What business does taxpayer money have to go be spent on sporting clubs unless they are being subsidized for the sake of the economy? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 413 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 215 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 22 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools." - Napoleon Bonaparte |