Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:04:40
Server time: 19:55:19, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Moderates

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2379

Description[?]:

This act has been created to help discourage the people from taking up cigarettes and alchohol. The dangers these drugs are many. They kill thousands upon thousands of people each year. So, it is necesary to discourage the consumption of these vices.

Legislature Resolution: The sale of alchoholic beverages shall continue. However, only low-medium strength beers are sold. They are allowed to be sold only to adults.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:57:23, March 20, 2007 CET
FromAldegar Freedom Party
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageThe TCP can support this bill.

Date16:43:34, March 21, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageWe agree.

Date00:44:46, March 22, 2007 CET
FromLeft Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageWe cannot support this bill. The government should not be forcing people to stop smoking and drinking.

Date00:46:47, March 22, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageSmoking and alchohol are as dangerous as drugs as all the illegal drugs. Besides, this isn't a ban of those substances, it's a greater restriction of those substances.

Date02:30:26, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageCan we count on support from the SD?

Date03:29:17, March 23, 2007 CET
FromLeft Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageA restriction on sales is still is an attempt to force people to quit. It is not the government's place to do so.

Date10:46:30, March 23, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageWe give support.

When we say explicitly, we do so. We never broke our word. We never will.

And agreeing and giving support is something different. We are able to take the right choice sometimes and see over our disagreements to insure better cooperation between coalition members.

Date21:56:58, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageAs to the LLP's comment, it is to within the government's place to stop suicides from perfectly healthy people(we are counting their health before the drugs were taken).

Date21:57:48, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageThe Party of Moderates thanks the Social Democrats for their support.

Date22:33:47, March 23, 2007 CET
FromAldegar Liberty Party
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageWe concur with the position of the Left Libertarians, government should not be legislating preference on these issues and should leave the issue up to the consenting adults who care to partake in these potentially dangerous hobbies.

Date23:52:37, March 23, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageWe should not be a nanny state. Let people do as they wish with their bodies, so long as they hurt noone else in the process.

Date23:59:58, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageThis isn't the product of being a nanny state. This a product of being a state that wants to stop a practice that destroys lives and families.

Date14:43:19, March 24, 2007 CET
FromS.C.A.F.R.
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageThis is a fascist resolution. I want the right to put tobacco, alchool and al that i want into my body. The state has to ban the use of syntetic drugs as cocain, lsd and more. we will vote no tothis fascist bill.

Date18:22:51, March 24, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Disallowment of Dangerous Substances Act
MessageThe restriction for alcohol and tobacco use are considered by the SD as such that sales are discontinued near schools, hospitals, kindergardens and capped with some number.

We feel this is a matter of interpretation. It is not fascist in our views. We will support regardless of the disagreement by the coalition members.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 413

no
    

Total Seats: 215

abstain
 

Total Seats: 22


Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too.

Random quote: "I am loyal to the ideas, not to the institutions." - Cyro Aquila, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 85