We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protecting Our Children Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pro Grain Club
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2377
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:31:17, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Freeminded People's Party | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | This is too much of a behavioral policeman's bill, the likes of which the Fascist Zealotry League might propose. This should not pass. |
Date | 14:41:21, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Pro Grain Club | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | A Behavioral policeman's bill? Talk about overexageration to the extreme. I simply do not want my 10 year old niece to see a man being sucked off on the bus. |
Date | 14:57:01, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Freeminded People's Party | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | We do not like public sex or nudity either, but at the same time we do not want to legislate against everything of which we disapprove. Should public sex between squirrels be illegal as well to protect your niece? We understand your concerns and they are legitimate ones, but all the same we still oppose this bill. |
Date | 15:50:38, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Order of Valtiel | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | Who cares about the children? |
Date | 19:49:17, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Fascist Zealotry League | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | There is a big difference between seeing a squirrel perform fellatio in a tree as opposed to a filthy hooker performing the act on the number #10 bus to Clearwater Station, FPP. Sometimes you really have to question the morals of the Liberal scourge! |
Date | 22:51:42, March 20, 2007 CET | From | Freeminded People's Party | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | I agree with the Fascists; the hooker makes less noise. |
Date | 02:23:51, March 21, 2007 CET | From | Fascist Zealotry League | To | Debating the Protecting Our Children Act |
Message | ...but charges more, unfortunately. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 414 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 186 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |