We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Liberty Act of 77
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Movement of Gaduridos
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2380
Description[?]:
| Restoring Civil Liberty's to the people |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Current: The police may only disperse a crowd if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Individuals are not permitted to own firearms under any circumstances.
Current: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Proposed: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is not inviolable.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:10:38, March 21, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | Discuss it:) |
| Date | 21:46:02, March 21, 2007 CET | From | People's Liberation Front | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | we are against the carring of fire arms in public for "personal protection" if nobody carries fire arms then there will be no need for protection. Gun crime is on the rise in all urban areas why do you wish to incourage it? |
| Date | 01:54:37, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | not only do you carry personal protection against other civilians, we just got out of 30 years Fascist rule, this is a protection we must ensure for not only themselves, but against there government. |
| Date | 15:35:41, March 22, 2007 CET | From | People's Liberation Front | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | There will be civil unrest at the moment caused by the collapse of the facist reigme. So why would we want to arm people? This will lead to armed rival gangs causing the same fear people knew under the facists. |
| Date | 17:04:02, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | For over 200 years our nation had freedom to keep and bare arms, it hasnt caused a problem yet, and remember the Fascist disappeared, all of them |
| Date | 17:04:33, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | For over 200 years our nation had freedom to keep and bare arms, it hasnt caused a problem yet, and remember the Fascist disappeared, all of them |
| Date | 17:04:46, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3906&start=210&mforum=particracy theres no one left to lead that revolution. |
| Date | 05:15:24, March 25, 2007 CET | From | Free Movement of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | We'll put this to ote after the elections |
| Date | 14:08:13, March 27, 2007 CET | From | Gadurian Peoples Party Party | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | This still isn't quite perfect but is closer to equality for all. I vote yes |
| Date | 14:27:04, March 27, 2007 CET | From | Gaduridos Dictatorship Radical Party | To | Debating the Liberty Act of 77 |
| Message | I agree with Liberation Front. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 141 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 294 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "An economist is a surgeon with an excellent scalpel and a rough-edged lancet, who operates beautifully on the dead and tortures the living." - Nicholas Chamfort |