We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent domain act 2378
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Forces of Decay
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2378
Description[?]:
If the government wants to build represantative buildings like monuments, statues, religious buildings like temples or similar things it should have the possibility to do so - whereever that would be. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Current: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Proposed: The government does not compensate victims of eminent domain.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:27:46, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Eminent domain act 2378 |
Message | Complete rubbish. |
Date | 22:26:44, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Eminent domain act 2378 |
Message | Absolutely ridiculous proposal. The main purpose of government is to defend the right to private property. |
Date | 22:49:41, March 22, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Eminent domain act 2378 |
Message | Bullshit! |
Date | 11:41:28, March 23, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Eminent domain act 2378 |
Message | The main purpose of government is to defend the right to private property? We don't think so. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 9 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 116 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed. |
Random quote: "We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant." - Karl Popper |